Digital Classrooms
Forvis Mazars – welcome to our Digital Classrooms! We are opening our Digital Classrooms to individual registrations, making our world-leading...
There are two different ways to calculate the average debt service coverage ratio (ADSCR) that could result in different numerical outcomes. What are the methods, what are the limitations that we should be aware of and which one should be used?
Debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) is one of the most commonly used debt metrics in project finance. Aside from the profile of the DSCR calculated on every calculation period, the ADSCR is an important output in a project finance model.
On the face of it there is not much difference, but this tutorial will demonstrate that they can result in very different numerical outcomes. We will discuss why they are different and when to use each method, particularly when dealing with exotic cash flows or repayments.
This may be the most common way to calculating the ADSCR.
Let’s recap this calculation method:
ADSCR = {AVERAGE ( IF ( RANGE < > 0, RANGE ) ) }
The ADSCR is calculated using the simple steps below:
ADSCR = total CFADS (life of loan) / total P+I (life of loan)
Let’s take a look at an example where the CFADS are flat and the debt is repaid on annuity basis, which means equal P+I. Period-by-period DSCRs are then calculated during the life of the loan and plotted, as shown below.
[image to be updated]
SCREENSHOT 1: FLAT REPAYMENT PROFILE
Here you can see that the average DSCR using both methods give very similar results, 1.62x and 1.63x.
SCREENSHOT 2: DSCR CHART FOR FLAT DEBT REPAYMENT
Now let’s look at what happens when the repayment profile is flat but with a final repayment which is lower than the others. This is not unusual but can seriously skew the average, the plot below shows the final DSCR is significantly higher than the others in the example.
SCREENSHOT 3: FINAL DSCR IS HIGHER
Here you can see that the two methods give very different results. Method 1 gives1.63x and method 2 results in 4.08x.
[image to be updated]
SCREENSHOT 4: LOWER LAST REPAYMENT
There is a conceptual difference behind the two calculation methods:
The difference is not obvious when the cash flow/debt service is flat, as demonstrated in the first example. However, this is best highlighted when there are extreme values, such as the final repayment being very small as shown in the later example. The DSCR in the last period is enormously high, which is given equal importance in Method 1 and distorting the overall average.
There is nothing wrong with either method. The important thing is to understand what they actually mean and be aware of the limitations.
In certain situations, be aware that Method 2 is probably more meaningful and would be the more accurate representation of the average.
There are numerous other tutorials and free resources related to financial modelling in Corality’s SMART Campus.
Some of the more popular courses that relate to this topic include:
This website uses cookies.
Some of these cookies are necessary, while others help us analyse our traffic, serve advertising and deliver customised experiences for you. For more information on the cookies we use, please refer to our Privacy Policy.
This website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Analytical cookies help us enhance our website by collecting information on its usage.
We use marketing cookies to increase the relevancy of our advertising campaigns.